Critical condition: People don’t dislike a corporate experiment more than they dislike its worst condition

Robert Mislavsky, Berkeley Dietvorst, Uri Simonsohn

Producción científica: Artículo en revista indizadaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

9 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Why have companies faced a backlash for running experiments? Academics and pundits have argued that people find corporate experimentation intrinsically objection-able. Here we investigate “experiment aversion,” finding evidence that, if anything, experiments are more acceptable than the worst policies they contain. In six studies, participants evaluated the acceptability of either corporate policy changes or of experiments testing them. When all policy changes were deemed acceptable, so was the experiment even when it involved deception, unequal outcomes, and lack of consent. When a policy change was deemed unacceptable, so was the experiment but less so. The acceptability of an experiment hinges on its critical condition—its least acceptable policy. Experiments are not unpopular; unpopular policies are unpopular.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)1092-1104
Número de páginas13
PublicaciónMarketing Science
Volumen39
N.º6
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2020
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Critical condition: People don’t dislike a corporate experiment more than they dislike its worst condition'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto