Critical condition: People don’t dislike a corporate experiment more than they dislike its worst condition

Robert Mislavsky, Berkeley Dietvorst, Uri Simonsohn

Producció científica: Article en revista indexadaArticleAvaluat per experts

9 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

Why have companies faced a backlash for running experiments? Academics and pundits have argued that people find corporate experimentation intrinsically objection-able. Here we investigate “experiment aversion,” finding evidence that, if anything, experiments are more acceptable than the worst policies they contain. In six studies, participants evaluated the acceptability of either corporate policy changes or of experiments testing them. When all policy changes were deemed acceptable, so was the experiment even when it involved deception, unequal outcomes, and lack of consent. When a policy change was deemed unacceptable, so was the experiment but less so. The acceptability of an experiment hinges on its critical condition—its least acceptable policy. Experiments are not unpopular; unpopular policies are unpopular.

Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)1092-1104
Nombre de pàgines13
RevistaMarketing Science
Volum39
Número6
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 2020
Publicat externament

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Critical condition: People don’t dislike a corporate experiment more than they dislike its worst condition'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho