Contestation in multi-stakeholder initiatives: Enhancing the democratic quality of transnational governance

Daniel Arenas, Laura Albareda, Jennifer Goodman

Producció científica: Article en revista indexadaArticleAvaluat per experts

33 Cites (Scopus)


This article stüs multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) as spaces for both deliberation and contestation between constituencies with competing discourses and disputed values, beliefs, and preferences. We review different theoretical perspectives on MSIs, which see them mainly as spaces to find solutions to market problems (economic approach), as spaces of conflict and bargaining (political approach), or as spaces of consensus (deliberative approach). In contrast, we build on a contestatory deliberative perspective, which gives equal value to both contestation and consensus. We identify four types of internal contestation which can be present in MSIs - procedural, inclusiveness, epistemic, and ultimate-goal - and argue that embracing contestation and engaging in ongoing revision of provisional agreements, criteria, and goals can enhance the democratic quality of MSIs. Finally, we explore the implications of this perspective for theorizing about the democratic quality in MSIs and about the role of corporations in transnational governance.

Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)169-199
Nombre de pàgines31
RevistaBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 1 d’abr. 2020


Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Contestation in multi-stakeholder initiatives: Enhancing the democratic quality of transnational governance'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho