Contestation in multi-stakeholder initiatives: Enhancing the democratic quality of transnational governance

Daniel Arenas, Laura Albareda, Jennifer Goodman

Producción científica: Artículo en revista indizadaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

34 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This article stüs multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) as spaces for both deliberation and contestation between constituencies with competing discourses and disputed values, beliefs, and preferences. We review different theoretical perspectives on MSIs, which see them mainly as spaces to find solutions to market problems (economic approach), as spaces of conflict and bargaining (political approach), or as spaces of consensus (deliberative approach). In contrast, we build on a contestatory deliberative perspective, which gives equal value to both contestation and consensus. We identify four types of internal contestation which can be present in MSIs - procedural, inclusiveness, epistemic, and ultimate-goal - and argue that embracing contestation and engaging in ongoing revision of provisional agreements, criteria, and goals can enhance the democratic quality of MSIs. Finally, we explore the implications of this perspective for theorizing about the democratic quality in MSIs and about the role of corporations in transnational governance.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)169-199
Número de páginas31
PublicaciónBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Volumen30
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 abr 2020

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Contestation in multi-stakeholder initiatives: Enhancing the democratic quality of transnational governance'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto