Resumen
We identify 15 claims Pham and Oh (2020) make to argue against pre-registration. We agree with 7 of the claims, but think that none of them justify delaying the encouragement and adoption of pre-registration. Moreover, while the claim they make in their title is correct—pre-registration is neither necessary nor sufficient for a credible science—this is also true of many our science’s most valuable tools, such as random assignment. Indeed, both random assignment and pre-registration lead to more credible research. Pre-registration is a game changer.
Idioma original | Inglés |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 177-180 |
Número de páginas | 4 |
Publicación | Journal of Consumer Psychology |
Volumen | 31 |
N.º | 1 |
DOI | |
Estado | Publicada - ene 2021 |
Publicado de forma externa | Sí |