TY - JOUR
T1 - Different modelling purposes
AU - Edmonds, Bruce
AU - Le Page, Christophe
AU - Bithell, Mike
AU - Chattoe-Brown, Edmund
AU - Grimm, Volker
AU - Meyer, Ruth
AU - Montañola-Sales, Cristina
AU - Ormerod, Paul
AU - Root, Hilton
AU - Squazzoni, Flaminio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, University of Surrey. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6/30
Y1 - 2019/6/30
N2 - How one builds, checks, validates and interprets a model depends on its ‘purpose’. This is true even if the same model code is used for different purposes. This means that a model built for one purpose but then used for another needs to be re-justified for the new purpose and this will probably mean it also has to be rechecked, re-validated and maybe even re-built in a differentway. Herewe review some of the different purposes for a simulation model of complex social phenomena, focusing on seven in particular: prediction, explanation, description, theoretical exploration, illustration, analogy, and social interaction. The paper looks at some of the implications in terms of the ways in which the intended purpose might fail. This analysis motivates some of the ways in which these ‘dangers’ might be avoided or mitigated. It also looks at the ways that a confusion of modelling purposes can fatally weaken modelling projects, whilst giving a false sense of their quality. These distinctions clarify some previous debates as to the best modelling strategy (e.g. KISS and KIDS). The paper ends with a plea for modellers to be clear concerning which purpose they are justifying their model against.
AB - How one builds, checks, validates and interprets a model depends on its ‘purpose’. This is true even if the same model code is used for different purposes. This means that a model built for one purpose but then used for another needs to be re-justified for the new purpose and this will probably mean it also has to be rechecked, re-validated and maybe even re-built in a differentway. Herewe review some of the different purposes for a simulation model of complex social phenomena, focusing on seven in particular: prediction, explanation, description, theoretical exploration, illustration, analogy, and social interaction. The paper looks at some of the implications in terms of the ways in which the intended purpose might fail. This analysis motivates some of the ways in which these ‘dangers’ might be avoided or mitigated. It also looks at the ways that a confusion of modelling purposes can fatally weaken modelling projects, whilst giving a false sense of their quality. These distinctions clarify some previous debates as to the best modelling strategy (e.g. KISS and KIDS). The paper ends with a plea for modellers to be clear concerning which purpose they are justifying their model against.
KW - Analogy
KW - Explanation
KW - Models
KW - Prediction
KW - Purpose
KW - Theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071223267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pure_univeritat_ramon_llull&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000475374400006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.18564/jasss.3993
DO - 10.18564/jasss.3993
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071223267
SN - 1460-7425
VL - 22
JO - JASSS
JF - JASSS
IS - 3
M1 - 6
ER -