Sustainable development: the stock market's view of environmental policy

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study applies panel data regression models to investigate how the stock market values the environmental policy of the firm. The empirical analysis relies on a cross-country sample of public firms for the period between 2014 and 2017 and uses the ratings of environmental performance (EP) released by Eikon Thomson Reuters. For the first time in the related literature, the price-to-sales multiple is used to capture the assessment of the stock market towards EP. The study reveals that firms with the highest (lowest) scores of EP are quoted at significantly lower (higher) price-to-sales multiples than other firms, indicating a negative perception of the stock market towards EP. This finding is mostly driven by firms from the American region (United States and Canada). However, even in the Scandinavian region, considered as the most advanced area with regard to the concern towards environmental issues, stock market participants do not seem to have a positive view of EP. These results are robust to various checks and, particularly, to the use of the Tobin Q ratio as an alternative indicator of the stock market perceptions. The inference of this analysis suggests that the negative assessment of the stock market towards EP may constitute a deterrent for achieving more environmentally committed firms, making it difficult to accomplish the United Nations' Sustainable Development agenda.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3273-3285
Number of pages13
JournalBusiness Strategy and the Environment
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Tobin's Q
  • environmental performance
  • environmental policy
  • financial performance
  • price-to-sales ratio
  • sustainable development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sustainable development: the stock market's view of environmental policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this