TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology-Based Psychosocial Interventions for People with Borderline Personality Disorder
T2 - A Scoping Review of the Literature
AU - Friás, Álvaro
AU - Solves, Laia
AU - Navarro, Sara
AU - Palma, Carol
AU - Farriols, Núria
AU - Aliaga, Ferrán
AU - Hernández, Mònica
AU - Antón, Meritxell
AU - Riera, Aloma
N1 - Funding Information:
Á. Frías received funds (SLT008/18/00175) for editing and proofreading the manuscript from the Pla Estratègic de Recerca i Innovació en Salut (PERIS 2019-2021) of the Department of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya. For the remaining authors no funding is declared.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Neuroepidemiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Evidence-based psychosocial interventions for borderline personality disorder (BPD) still face multiple challenges regarding treatment accessibility, adherence, duration, and economic costs. Over the last decade, technology has addressed these concerns from different disciplines. The current scoping review aimed to delineate novel and ongoing clinical research on technology-based psychosocial interventions for patients with BPD. Online databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar) were searched up to June 2020. Technology-based psychosocial treatments included innovative communication (eHealth) and computational (e.g., artificial intelligence), computing (e.g., computer-based), or medical (e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI]) software. Clinical research encompassed any testing stage (e.g., feasibility, efficacy). Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The main findings were the following: almost two-thirds of the studies (9/15) tested software explicitly conceived as adjunctive interventions to conventional therapy; nearly half of the studies (7/15) were referred to as dialectical behavior therapy-based software; most studies (13/15) were focused on the initial stage of the clinical research cycle (feasibility/acceptance/usability testing), reporting good results at this point; more than one-third of the studies (6/15) tested mobile apps; there is emerging evidence for Internet-based interventions and real-time fMRI biofeedback but only little evidence for mHealth interventions, virtual and augmented reality, and computer-based interventions; there was no computational technology-based clinical research; and there was no satisfaction/preference, security/safety, or efficiency testing for any software. Taken together, the results suggest that there is a growing but still incipient amount of technology-based psychosocial interventions for BPD supported by some kind of clinical evidence. The limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
AB - Evidence-based psychosocial interventions for borderline personality disorder (BPD) still face multiple challenges regarding treatment accessibility, adherence, duration, and economic costs. Over the last decade, technology has addressed these concerns from different disciplines. The current scoping review aimed to delineate novel and ongoing clinical research on technology-based psychosocial interventions for patients with BPD. Online databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar) were searched up to June 2020. Technology-based psychosocial treatments included innovative communication (eHealth) and computational (e.g., artificial intelligence), computing (e.g., computer-based), or medical (e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI]) software. Clinical research encompassed any testing stage (e.g., feasibility, efficacy). Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The main findings were the following: almost two-thirds of the studies (9/15) tested software explicitly conceived as adjunctive interventions to conventional therapy; nearly half of the studies (7/15) were referred to as dialectical behavior therapy-based software; most studies (13/15) were focused on the initial stage of the clinical research cycle (feasibility/acceptance/usability testing), reporting good results at this point; more than one-third of the studies (6/15) tested mobile apps; there is emerging evidence for Internet-based interventions and real-time fMRI biofeedback but only little evidence for mHealth interventions, virtual and augmented reality, and computer-based interventions; there was no computational technology-based clinical research; and there was no satisfaction/preference, security/safety, or efficiency testing for any software. Taken together, the results suggest that there is a growing but still incipient amount of technology-based psychosocial interventions for BPD supported by some kind of clinical evidence. The limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
KW - Borderline personality disorder
KW - Clinical research
KW - Psychosocial treatments
KW - Software
KW - Technology-based interventions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096990988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000511349
DO - 10.1159/000511349
M3 - Review
C2 - 33166964
AN - SCOPUS:85096990988
SN - 0254-4962
VL - 53
SP - 254
EP - 263
JO - Psychopathology
JF - Psychopathology
IS - 5
ER -