TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health
AU - Messiha, Katrina
AU - Chinapaw, Mai J.M.
AU - Ket, Hans C.F.F.
AU - An, Qingfan
AU - Anand-Kumar, Vinayak
AU - Longworth, Giuliana R.
AU - Chastin, Sebastien
AU - Altenburg, Teatske M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health.
PY - 2023/9/1
Y1 - 2023/9/1
N2 - Background: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. Methods: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed. Results: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating. Conclusion: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research.
AB - Background: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. Methods: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed. Results: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating. Conclusion: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research.
KW - co-design
KW - co-production
KW - Keywords co-creation
KW - public health
KW - theoretical framework
KW - theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166017970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdad046
DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdad046
M3 - Article
C2 - 37147918
AN - SCOPUS:85166017970
SN - 1741-3842
VL - 45
SP - 723
EP - 737
JO - Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)
JF - Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)
IS - 3
ER -