Safety and immunogenicity of the protein-based PHH-1V compared to BNT162b2 as a heterologous SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine in adults vaccinated against COVID-19: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority phase IIb trial

Júlia Corominas, Carme Garriga, Antoni Prenafeta, Alexandra Moros, Manuel Cañete, Antonio Barreiro, Luis González-González, Laia Madrenas, Irina Güell, Bonaventura Clotet, Nuria Izquierdo-Useros, Dàlia Raïch-Regué, Marçal Gallemí, Julià Blanco, Edwards Pradenas, Benjamin Trinité, Julia G. Prado, Oscar Blanch-Lombarte, Raúl Pérez-Caballero, Montserrat PlanaIgnasi Esteban, Carmen Pastor-Quiñones, Xavier Núñez-Costa, Rachel Abu Taleb, Paula McSkimming, Alex Soriano, Jocelyn Nava, Jesse Omar Anagua, Rafel Ramos, Ruth Martí Lluch, Aida Corpes Comes, Susana Otero Romero, Xavier Martinez Gomez, Carla Sans-Pola, José Moltó, Susana Benet, Lucía Bailón, Jose R. Arribas, Alberto M. Borobia, Javier Queiruga Parada, Jorge Navarro-Pérez, Maria José Forner Giner, Rafael Ortí Lucas, María del Mar Vázquez Jiménez, Salvador Oña Compán, Melchor Alvarez-Mon, Daniel Troncoso, Eunate Arana-Arri, Susana Meijide, Natale Imaz-Ayo, Patricia Muñoz García, Sofía de la Villa Martínez, Sara Rodríguez Fernández, Teresa Prat, Èlia Torroella, Laura Ferrer

Producció científica: Article en revista indexadaArticleAvaluat per experts

2 Cites (Scopus)


Background: A SARS-CoV-2 protein-based heterodimer vaccine, PHH-1V, has been shown to be safe and well-tolerated in healthy young adults in a first-in-human, Phase I/IIa study dose-escalation trial. Here, we report the interim results of the Phase IIb HH-2, where the immunogenicity and safety of a heterologous booster with PHH-1V is assessed versus a homologous booster with BNT162b2 at 14, 28 and 98 days after vaccine administration. Methods: The HH-2 study is an ongoing multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority Phase IIb trial, where participants 18 years or older who had received two doses of BNT162b2 were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a booster dose of vaccine—either heterologous (PHH-1V group) or homologous (BNT162b2 group)—in 10 centres in Spain. Eligible subjects were allocated to treatment stratified by age group (18–64 versus ≥65 years) with approximately 10% of the sample enrolled in the older age group. The primary endpoints were humoral immunogenicity measured by changes in levels of neutralizing antibodies (PBNA) against the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain after the PHH-1V or the BNT162b2 boost, and the safety and tolerability of PHH-1V as a boost. The secondary endpoints were to compare changes in levels of neutralizing antibodies against different variants of SARS-CoV-2 and the T-cell responses towards the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein peptides. The exploratory endpoint was to assess the number of subjects with SARS-CoV-2 infections ≥14 days after PHH-1V booster. This study is ongoing and is registered with, NCT05142553. Findings: From 15 November 2021, 782 adults were randomly assigned to PHH-1V (n = 522) or BNT162b2 (n = 260) boost vaccine groups. The geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of neutralizing antibodies on days 14, 28 and 98, shown as BNT162b2 active control versus PHH-1V, was, respectively, 1.68 (p < 0.0001), 1.31 (p = 0.0007) and 0.86 (p = 0.40) for the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain; 0.62 (p < 0.0001), 0.65 (p < 0.0001) and 0.56 (p = 0.003) for the Beta variant; 1.01 (p = 0.92), 0.88 (p = 0.11) and 0.52 (p = 0.0003) for the Delta variant; and 0.59 (p ≤ 0.0001), 0.66 (p < 0.0001) and 0.57 (p = 0.0028) for the Omicron BA.1 variant. Additionally, PHH-1V as a booster dose induced a significant increase of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells expressing IFN-γ on day 14. There were 458 participants who experienced at least one adverse event (89.3%) in the PHH-1V and 238 (94.4%) in the BNT162b2 group. The most frequent adverse events were injection site pain (79.7% and 89.3%), fatigue (27.5% and 42.1%) and headache (31.2 and 40.1%) for the PHH-1V and the BNT162b2 groups, respectively. A total of 52 COVID-19 cases occurred from day 14 post-vaccination (10.14%) for the PHH-1V group and 30 (11.90%) for the BNT162b2 group (p = 0.45), and none of the subjects developed severe COVID-19. Interpretation: Our interim results from the Phase IIb HH-2 trial show that PHH-1V as a heterologous booster vaccine, when compared to BNT162b2, although it does not reach a non-inferior neutralizing antibody response against the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain at days 14 and 28 after vaccination, it does so at day 98. PHH-1V as a heterologous booster elicits a superior neutralizing antibody response against the previous circulating Beta and the currently circulating Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants in all time points assessed, and for the Delta variant on day 98 as well. Moreover, the PHH-1V boost also induces a strong and balanced T-cell response. Concerning the safety profile, subjects in the PHH-1V group report significantly fewer adverse events than those in the BNT162b2 group, most of mild intensity, and both vaccine groups present comparable COVID-19 breakthrough cases, none of them severe. Funding: HIPRA SCIENTIFIC, S.L.U.

Idioma originalAnglès
Número d’article100613
RevistaThe Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - de maig 2023
Publicat externament


Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Safety and immunogenicity of the protein-based PHH-1V compared to BNT162b2 as a heterologous SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine in adults vaccinated against COVID-19: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority phase IIb trial'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho