¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de posverdad? Análisis del término en siete diarios de calidad

Producció científica: Article en revista indexadaArticleAvaluat per experts

5 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

The use of “post-truth” has normalized as a way to conceptualize political and social phenomena considered new, as the election of Donald Trump or the Brexit. Despite this widespread use of the term “post-truth”, it is still a concept with little concrete meaning. This research focuses on this problem, analysing the uses that seven media have made of “post-truth” during 2017: The New York Times, The guardian, The times, Le monde, Le figaro, El país and ABC. 151 articles have been analysed, those in which the use of “post-truth” provided some clue to establish a meaning. The research provides two conclusions: (a) post-truth is a concept of political communication that serves to characterize a change in the relationship that society has with the truth; (b) it is a term with a political bias that is used to designate an opponent who is perceived as an enemy of the society model.

Títol traduït de la contribucióWhat do we talk about when we talk about posttrouth? Analysis of the term in seven quality journals
Idioma originalCastellà
RevistaProfesional de la Informacion
Volum28
Número3
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 2019

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de '¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de posverdad? Análisis del término en siete diarios de calidad'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho