TY - JOUR
T1 - Corporate Stakeholder Orientation in an Emerging Country Context
T2 - A Longitudinal Cross Industry Analysis
AU - Jain, Tanusree
AU - Aguilera Vaqués, R.
AU - Jamali, Dima
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - This study examines corporate stakeholder orientation (CSO) across industries and over time prior to the introduction of mandatory CSR. We argue that CSO is a legitimacy signal consciously employed by firms to demonstrate their shareholder and specific non-shareholder orientations in the midst of institutional pressures emerging from country and industry contexts. Using a 7-code index of CSO on CEO–shareholder communications from India, we find that in general large firms in India exhibit a pre-dominant, significant and rising trend of pro-shareholder orientation in the six-year period immediately preceding the CSR law. Yet, we uncover significant industry differences in CSO potentially driven by four key factors: the degree of competitive dynamics, nature of products and services, extent of negative externalities and social activism, and exposure to international markets. Our findings support the view that while some minimum threshold of regulatory intervention is required to balance the interests of business with society, legislation raises questions in relation to the usefulness of a uniform one-size-fits-all CSR across all industries.
AB - This study examines corporate stakeholder orientation (CSO) across industries and over time prior to the introduction of mandatory CSR. We argue that CSO is a legitimacy signal consciously employed by firms to demonstrate their shareholder and specific non-shareholder orientations in the midst of institutional pressures emerging from country and industry contexts. Using a 7-code index of CSO on CEO–shareholder communications from India, we find that in general large firms in India exhibit a pre-dominant, significant and rising trend of pro-shareholder orientation in the six-year period immediately preceding the CSR law. Yet, we uncover significant industry differences in CSO potentially driven by four key factors: the degree of competitive dynamics, nature of products and services, extent of negative externalities and social activism, and exposure to international markets. Our findings support the view that while some minimum threshold of regulatory intervention is required to balance the interests of business with society, legislation raises questions in relation to the usefulness of a uniform one-size-fits-all CSR across all industries.
KW - Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
KW - Corporate stakeholder orientation (CSO)
KW - Emerging country
KW - Industry CSR
KW - Institutional theory
KW - Mandatory CSR
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959514469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10551-016-3074-1
DO - 10.1007/s10551-016-3074-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959514469
SN - 0167-4544
VL - 143
SP - 701
EP - 719
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
IS - 4
ER -