Raul Calvo Serrano

Engineering

1. Life Cycle Assessment 100%
2. Lifecycle 90%
3. Environmental Impact 84%
4. Cycle Impact 34%
5. Global Warming Potential 30%
6. Linear Programming 21%
7. Limitations 18%
8. Fixed Mass 18%
9. Limited Number 18%
10. Life Cycle Impact Assessment 18%
11. Chemical Attribute 18%
12. Energy Storage 18%
13. Ecoinvent Database 18%
14. Manufacturing Organization 18%
15. Impact Indicator 18%
16. Biomass Conversion 18%
17. Wind Power 18%
18. Earth System 18%
19. Production Line 18%
20. Optimization Approach 18%
21. Biomass Resource 18%
22. Sectoral 18%
23. Mathematical Model 18%
24. Renewable Energy 18%
25. Fine Chemical 12%
26. Impact Category 9%
27. Energy Storage Application 9%
28. Chemical Energy Storage 9%
29. Chemical Energy 9%
30. Energy Storage Technology 9%
31. Improvement Strategies 9%
32. Policymakers 9%
33. Energy Source 9%
34. Global Warming 9%
35. Energy Input 9%
36. Energy Engineering 9%
37. Risk Level 9%
38. Renewables 9%
39. Natural Gas 9%
40. Improvement Potential 9%
41. Shortcuts 7%
42. Eco-Indicator 7%
43. Product Requirement 6%
44. World Bank 6%
45. Similarities 6%
46. Global Scale 6%
47. Disruptions 6%
48. Target Level 6%
49. Real Industrial Process 6%
50. Production Planning 6%