TY - JOUR
T1 - When geography matters
T2 - International diversification and firm performance of spanish multinationals
AU - Mendoza Mayordomo, F.
AU - Espinosa-Méndez, Christian
AU - Araya-Castillo, Luis
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors would like to express their gratitude to Proyecto Código 031563EC, Dirección de Investigación, Científica y Tecnológica, Dicyt, from the Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Usach, as well as to the Observatory of Spanish Multinational Companies (OEME), a joint initiative of ESADE Business School, ICEX España Exportación e Inversiones and EY (former Ernst & Young).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - This paper studies how the nature and shape of the relationship between inter-national diversification (ID) and performance (P) may vary according to a firm’s geographical focus of internationalization. Using a sample of Spanish multinational firms for the 2004—2012 period we find an M-shaped relationship. However, significant differences are found when the different geographical foci of internationalization are considered. Strong support is found when firms adopt a regional focus (an inverted S-curve when the ID measure refers to the number of foreign countries and an M-curve when it refers to the size of the network of foreign sub-sidiaries), a biregional focus (an S-curve) and a semiglobal focus (an inverted S-curve but also an M-curve with foreign subsidiaries). These findings and their pattern suggest the critical impor-tance of the country of origin and the geographical focus of internationalization in explaining the relationship between ID—P.
AB - This paper studies how the nature and shape of the relationship between inter-national diversification (ID) and performance (P) may vary according to a firm’s geographical focus of internationalization. Using a sample of Spanish multinational firms for the 2004—2012 period we find an M-shaped relationship. However, significant differences are found when the different geographical foci of internationalization are considered. Strong support is found when firms adopt a regional focus (an inverted S-curve when the ID measure refers to the number of foreign countries and an M-curve when it refers to the size of the network of foreign sub-sidiaries), a biregional focus (an S-curve) and a semiglobal focus (an inverted S-curve but also an M-curve with foreign subsidiaries). These findings and their pattern suggest the critical impor-tance of the country of origin and the geographical focus of internationalization in explaining the relationship between ID—P.
KW - Firm performance
KW - Geographical focus
KW - International diversification
KW - M-curve
KW - Multinational firms
KW - Spain
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083732047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2340944420898981
DO - 10.1177/2340944420898981
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85083732047
SN - 2340-9436
VL - 23
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - BRQ Business Research Quarterly
JF - BRQ Business Research Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -