TY - JOUR
T1 - Transfers of care between healthcare professionals in obstetric units of different sizes across spain and in a hospital in Ireland
T2 - The midconbirth study
AU - Martín-Arribas, Anna
AU - Vila-Candel, Rafael
AU - O’connell, Rhona
AU - Dillon, Martina
AU - Vila-Bellido, Inmaculada
AU - Beneyto, M. Ángeles
AU - De Molina-Fernández, Inmaculada
AU - Rodríguez-Conesa, Nerea
AU - González-Blázquez, Cristina
AU - Escuriet, Ramón
N1 - Funding Information:
The MidconBirth Study was funded by the Catalan Council of Nurses—Midwives Commission. This contributed to the creation of a web-based platform for data collection. This grant contributed to the dissemination of the study results. And finally, this study contributes to COST action IS 1405. The publication cost was made by Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull. Acknowledgments: We are grateful to all women and their families who participated in this study and all midwives who collected data for the MidconBirth study and thank them for their support with this research.
Funding Information:
Funding: The MidconBirth Study was funded by the Catalan Council of Nurses—Midwives Commission. This contributed to the creation of a web-based platform for data collection. This grant contributed to the dissemination of the study results. And finally, this study contributes to COST action IS 1405. The publication cost was made by Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020/11/2
Y1 - 2020/11/2
N2 - Background: In Europe, the majority of healthy women give birth at conventional obstetric units with the assistance of registered midwives. This study examines the relationships between the intrapartum transfer of care (TOC) from midwife to obstetrician-led maternity care, obstetric unit size (OUS) with different degrees of midwifery autonomy, intrapartum interventions and birth outcomes. Methods: A prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study promoted by the COST Action IS1405 was carried out at eight public hospitals in Spain and Ireland between 2016–2019. The primary outcome was TOC. The secondary outcomes included type of onset of labour, oxytocin stimulation, epidural analgesia, type of birth, episiotomy/perineal injury, postpartum haemorrhage, early initiation of breastfeeding and early skin-to-skin contact. A logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of studied co-variables on the likelihood that participants had a TOC; Results: Out of a total of 2,126 low-risk women, those whose intrapartum care was initiated by a midwife (1772) were selected. There were statistically significant differences between TOC and OUS (S1 = 29.0%, S2 = 44.0%, S3 = 52.9%, S4 = 30.2%, p < 0.001). Statistically differences between OUS and onset of labour, oxytocin stimulation, type of birth and episiotomy or perineal injury were observed (p = 0.009, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively); Conclusions: Findings suggest that the model of care and OUS have a significant effect on the prevalence of intrapartum TOC and the birth outcomes. Future research should examine how models of care differ as a function of the OUS in a hospital, as well as the cost-effectiveness for the health care system.
AB - Background: In Europe, the majority of healthy women give birth at conventional obstetric units with the assistance of registered midwives. This study examines the relationships between the intrapartum transfer of care (TOC) from midwife to obstetrician-led maternity care, obstetric unit size (OUS) with different degrees of midwifery autonomy, intrapartum interventions and birth outcomes. Methods: A prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study promoted by the COST Action IS1405 was carried out at eight public hospitals in Spain and Ireland between 2016–2019. The primary outcome was TOC. The secondary outcomes included type of onset of labour, oxytocin stimulation, epidural analgesia, type of birth, episiotomy/perineal injury, postpartum haemorrhage, early initiation of breastfeeding and early skin-to-skin contact. A logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of studied co-variables on the likelihood that participants had a TOC; Results: Out of a total of 2,126 low-risk women, those whose intrapartum care was initiated by a midwife (1772) were selected. There were statistically significant differences between TOC and OUS (S1 = 29.0%, S2 = 44.0%, S3 = 52.9%, S4 = 30.2%, p < 0.001). Statistically differences between OUS and onset of labour, oxytocin stimulation, type of birth and episiotomy or perineal injury were observed (p = 0.009, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively); Conclusions: Findings suggest that the model of care and OUS have a significant effect on the prevalence of intrapartum TOC and the birth outcomes. Future research should examine how models of care differ as a function of the OUS in a hospital, as well as the cost-effectiveness for the health care system.
KW - Continuity of care
KW - Maternal outcomes
KW - Midwife-led care
KW - Neonatal outcomes
KW - Obstetrician-led care
KW - Transfer of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096047023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph17228394
DO - 10.3390/ijerph17228394
M3 - Article
C2 - 33202745
AN - SCOPUS:85096047023
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 22
M1 - 8394
ER -