TY - JOUR
T1 - Talking the talk, but not walking the walk
T2 - A comparison of self-reported and observed prosocial behaviour
AU - Awan, Sahar
AU - Esteve Laporta, M.
AU - van Witteloostuijn, Arjen
N1 - Funding Information:
AGAUR (Agency for Management of University and Research Grants), Grant/Award Number: 2017-SGR-1556; Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España, Grant/Award Number: CSO2016-80823-P
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - The claim that Public Service Motivation (PSM) is an antecedent of prosocial behaviour has often been empirically tested and supported. However, closer inspection of this literature reveals large disparities in relating the two constructs. One reason that could explain such differences is that the relationship between PSM and prosocial behaviours has been primarily tested using self-reported cross-sectional, single-rater and same-survey data. While all of these are widely used methodological approaches in social sciences, they are also susceptible to potential biases. We conduct two comparative studies to re-examine this relationship. Study 1 utilizes self-reported cross-sectional, single-rater and same-survey data linking PSM and prosocial behaviour, revealing a positive relationship with PSM's Compassion dimension. Study 2 involves observing actual prosocial behaviour in a real-life setting. Then, the correlation between PSM and prosocial behaviour disappears. We conclude by discussing the possible reasons that could lead to the differences found across the two studies.
AB - The claim that Public Service Motivation (PSM) is an antecedent of prosocial behaviour has often been empirically tested and supported. However, closer inspection of this literature reveals large disparities in relating the two constructs. One reason that could explain such differences is that the relationship between PSM and prosocial behaviours has been primarily tested using self-reported cross-sectional, single-rater and same-survey data. While all of these are widely used methodological approaches in social sciences, they are also susceptible to potential biases. We conduct two comparative studies to re-examine this relationship. Study 1 utilizes self-reported cross-sectional, single-rater and same-survey data linking PSM and prosocial behaviour, revealing a positive relationship with PSM's Compassion dimension. Study 2 involves observing actual prosocial behaviour in a real-life setting. Then, the correlation between PSM and prosocial behaviour disappears. We conclude by discussing the possible reasons that could lead to the differences found across the two studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082775014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/padm.12664
DO - 10.1111/padm.12664
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85082775014
SN - 0033-3298
VL - 98
SP - 995
EP - 1010
JO - Public Administration
JF - Public Administration
IS - 4
ER -