Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies

Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas; Leticia Duboc; Stefanie Betz; Ruzanna Chitchyan; Birgit Penzenstadler; Colin C. Venters

Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies

Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas
, Leticia Duboc
, Stefanie Betz
, Ruzanna Chitchyan
, Birgit Penzenstadler
, Colin C. Venters

Producción científica: Artículo en revista indizada › Artículo de conferencia › revisión exhaustiva

8 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.

Idioma original	Inglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)	25-34
Número de páginas	10
Publicación	CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volumen	1416
Estado	Publicada - 2015
Publicado de forma externa	Sí
Evento	4th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Sustainable Systems, RE4SuSy 2015 - co-located with the 23rd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2015 - Ottawa, Canadá Duración: 24 ago 2015 → …

Otros archivos y enlaces

Enlace a la publicación en Scopus

Cómo citar

@article{f807bd25360e4a05bc5229432d5634fe,

title = "Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies",

abstract = "The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.",

keywords = "Non-functional requirements, Safety, Sustainability",

author = "Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas and Leticia Duboc and Stefanie Betz and Ruzanna Chitchyan and Birgit Penzenstadler and Venters, \{Colin C.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 for this paper by its authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes.; 4th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Sustainable Systems, RE4SuSy 2015 - co-located with the 23rd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2015 ; Conference date: 24-08-2015",

year = "2015",

language = "English",

volume = "1416",

pages = "25--34",

journal = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

issn = "1613-0073",

publisher = "CEUR-WS",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety vs. sustainability design

T2 - 4th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Sustainable Systems, RE4SuSy 2015 - co-located with the 23rd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2015

AU - Rodriguez-Navas, Guillermo

AU - Duboc, Leticia

AU - Betz, Stefanie

AU - Chitchyan, Ruzanna

AU - Penzenstadler, Birgit

AU - Venters, Colin C.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.

AB - The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.

KW - Non-functional requirements

KW - Safety

KW - Sustainability

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84940052632

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84940052632

SN - 1613-0073

VL - 1416

SP - 25

EP - 34

JO - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

JF - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Y2 - 24 August 2015

ER -

Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies

Resumen

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Cómo citar