Resumen
How do incumbent firms respond over time to a potentially disruptive technology? This article documents the strategies of 12 large pharmaceutical firms over 25 years as they addressed the opportunity/threat of biotechnology. All showed awareness of biotechnology’s potential, but their response profiles varied dramatically in terms of timing (early/late) and focus (external/internal). Late movers mostly made large acquisitions to “catch up,” but early movers maintained their lead in terms of biotechnology-based drug sales and profitability, and those with a more “open” response profile performed better. This response involves a three-step process: building awareness (sensing), building capability (responding), and building commitment (scaling).
| Idioma original | Inglés |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 74-100 |
| Número de páginas | 27 |
| Publicación | California Management Review |
| Volumen | 60 |
| N.º | 4 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 1 ago 2018 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Responding to a potentially disruptive technology: How big pharma embraced biotechnology'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Cómo citar
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver