Resumen
This article aims to analyse the lectures that Heidegger dedicated to Parmenides in the Summer Semester of 1932. In them Heidegger offers a different interpretation to the traditional one set by Plato and followed by Aristotle and Simplicius.
For Heidegger, Western metaphysics did not manage to explicitly show the ontological necessity of the link between alétheia
and dóxa. The Parmenides being is not “zeitlos”, but presence. Being can only be interpreted when referred to temporality and to the present. It is our contention that feeling dissatisfied with the way tradition has transmitted Parmenides’ original thought, Heidegger suggests a new reading of the foundational poem of the Greek philosopher that intentionally breaks with Western metaphysics, the Roman culture, Christianity and Judaism.
For Heidegger, Western metaphysics did not manage to explicitly show the ontological necessity of the link between alétheia
and dóxa. The Parmenides being is not “zeitlos”, but presence. Being can only be interpreted when referred to temporality and to the present. It is our contention that feeling dissatisfied with the way tradition has transmitted Parmenides’ original thought, Heidegger suggests a new reading of the foundational poem of the Greek philosopher that intentionally breaks with Western metaphysics, the Roman culture, Christianity and Judaism.
| Título traducido de la contribución | Parménides: el principio del pensamiento occidental. Las lecciones de Heidegger de 1932 |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Inglés |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 9-35 |
| Número de páginas | 27 |
| Publicación | Studia Heideggeriana |
| Volumen | 15 |
| N.º | 2250-8740 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 15 may 2026 |
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Parménides: el principio del pensamiento occidental. Las lecciones de Heidegger de 1932'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Cómo citar
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver