It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)

U. Simonsohn

doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.006

It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)

U. Simonsohn^*

^*Autor/a de correspondencia de este trabajo

Producción científica: Artículo en revista indizada › Comentario/Debate

20 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

I discuss points of agreement and disagreement with Francis (2013), and argue that the main lesson from his numerous one-off publication bias critiques is that developers of new statistical tools ought to anticipate their potential misuses and develop safeguards to prevent them.

Idioma original	Inglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)	174-176
Número de páginas	3
Publicación	Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Volumen	57
N.º	5
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.006
Estado	Publicada - oct 2013
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

Acceder al documento

10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.006

Otros archivos y enlaces

Enlace a la publicación en Scopus

Cómo citar

@article{b0296a119f9247ce8d6b612a8e6c1b5f,

title = "It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)",

abstract = "I discuss points of agreement and disagreement with Francis (2013), and argue that the main lesson from his numerous one-off publication bias critiques is that developers of new statistical tools ought to anticipate their potential misuses and develop safeguards to prevent them.",

keywords = "Logical inferences",

author = "U. Simonsohn",

year = "2013",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.006",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "174--176",

journal = "Journal of Mathematical Psychology",

issn = "0022-2496",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)

AU - Simonsohn, U.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - I discuss points of agreement and disagreement with Francis (2013), and argue that the main lesson from his numerous one-off publication bias critiques is that developers of new statistical tools ought to anticipate their potential misuses and develop safeguards to prevent them.

AB - I discuss points of agreement and disagreement with Francis (2013), and argue that the main lesson from his numerous one-off publication bias critiques is that developers of new statistical tools ought to anticipate their potential misuses and develop safeguards to prevent them.

KW - Logical inferences

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84886724584

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.006

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84886724584

SN - 0022-2496

VL - 57

SP - 174

EP - 176

JO - Journal of Mathematical Psychology

JF - Journal of Mathematical Psychology

IS - 5

ER -

It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)

Resumen

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Cómo citar