Friends, relatives, and couples¿ perspectives on multisource assessments of emotional and social competencies

  • J. Batista-Foguet
  • , Basak Canboy
  • , Nicolas Loewe Pujol-Xicoy
  • , Leticia Pilar Mosteo Chagoyen
  • , Margarida Truninger De Albuquerque

Producción científica: Contribución a una conferenciaContribuciónrevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

This article examines whether extending rater sources beyond the traditional organizational setting provides complementary feedback for a manager through 360° assessments. Using 14 emotional, social, and cognitive competencies, we compared 358 MBA students¿ ratings from supervisors, work-peers, subordinates, friends, relatives, and spouses. Results show that personal and professional sources were similarly suited to evaluate these competencies. While differences among co-workers¿ ratings were found not to be statistically significant, personal sources¿ ratings were higher than co-workers¿ assessments across most of the competencies. We advocate that, in spite of a leniency bias, including personal sources in 360° assessments can increase managers¿ acceptance of the feedback.
Idioma originalInglés
EstadoPublicada - 8 sept 2013
Evento4th International Congress on Emotional Intelligence (ICEI 2013) -
Duración: 8 sept 201310 sept 2013

Conferencia

Conferencia4th International Congress on Emotional Intelligence (ICEI 2013)
Período8/09/1310/09/13

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Friends, relatives, and couples¿ perspectives on multisource assessments of emotional and social competencies'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Cómo citar