TY - CONF
T1 - Corporate political responsibility: The case of Royal Dutch Shell in Nigeria
AU - Hennchen, Esther
AU - Lozano, J.
PY - 2012/7/2
Y1 - 2012/7/2
N2 - Royal Dutch Shell has started to assume social and political responsibilities that go beyond legal requirements and fill the regulatory vacuum in global governance and a public responsibility gap in Nigeria. Which implications does this engagement have for the firm, governance and democracy? We explore along Scherer and Palazzo's (Scherer & Palazzo,
2011) new societal frame of reference the implications of Shell's politicized role in a context where a regulatory governance framework is missing at the local and the global level. By drawing on public sources and in-depth interviews we suggest that 'political CSR' - extended model of governance with business firms contributing to global regulation and providing public goods - is a reality for Shell at the local and global level. Our findings reveal a rather
mixed picture, which questions the company's moral legitimacy, self-regulation, and deliberative approach and suggests a potential extension of Scherer and Palazzo's
framework beyond a simple dichotomy. We contribute to the literature on global governance and corporate governance in Africa whilst creating an understanding of the political embeddedness of Shell's CSR agenda in the institutionalframework and power relationships. The extent to which Shell's CSR agenda is limited by the reach of workable
regulation (Rodrick, 2011) also invites to theorize on the role of the state in global governance in particular and marketbased initiatives within the neo-liberal framework in general.
AB - Royal Dutch Shell has started to assume social and political responsibilities that go beyond legal requirements and fill the regulatory vacuum in global governance and a public responsibility gap in Nigeria. Which implications does this engagement have for the firm, governance and democracy? We explore along Scherer and Palazzo's (Scherer & Palazzo,
2011) new societal frame of reference the implications of Shell's politicized role in a context where a regulatory governance framework is missing at the local and the global level. By drawing on public sources and in-depth interviews we suggest that 'political CSR' - extended model of governance with business firms contributing to global regulation and providing public goods - is a reality for Shell at the local and global level. Our findings reveal a rather
mixed picture, which questions the company's moral legitimacy, self-regulation, and deliberative approach and suggests a potential extension of Scherer and Palazzo's
framework beyond a simple dichotomy. We contribute to the literature on global governance and corporate governance in Africa whilst creating an understanding of the political embeddedness of Shell's CSR agenda in the institutionalframework and power relationships. The extent to which Shell's CSR agenda is limited by the reach of workable
regulation (Rodrick, 2011) also invites to theorize on the role of the state in global governance in particular and marketbased initiatives within the neo-liberal framework in general.
M3 - Contribution
T2 - 28th EGOS Colloquium
Y2 - 2 July 2012 through 7 July 2012
ER -