Resumen
When studies examine true effects, they generate right-skewed p-curves, distributions of statistically significant results ith more low (.01 s) than high (.04 s) p values. What else can cause a right-skewed p-curve? First, we consider the possibility hat researchers report only the smallest significant p value (as conjectured by Ulrich & Miller, 2015), concluding that it is a ery uncommon problem. We then consider more common problems, including (a) p-curvers selecting the wrong p values, (b) fake data, c) honest errors, and (d) ambitiously p-hacked (beyond p = .05) results. We evaluate the impact of these common problems on the alidity of p-curve analysis, and provide practical solutions that substantially increase its robustness.
| Idioma original | Inglés |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1146-1152 |
| Número de páginas | 7 |
| Publicación | Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |
| Volumen | 144 |
| N.º | 6 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 1 dic 2015 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Better P-Curves: Making p-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious p-hacking, a reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015)'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Cómo citar
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver