A manifesto for reproducible science

Marcus R. Munafò*, Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy V.M. Bishop, Katherine S. Button, Christopher D. Chambers, Nathalie Percie Du Sert, U. Simonsohn, Eric Jan Wagenmakers, Jennifer J. Ware, John P.A. Ioannidis

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Artículo en revista indizadaRecensiónrevisión exhaustiva

1945 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: Methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives. There is some evidence from both simulations and empirical studies supporting the likely effectiveness of these measures, but their broad adoption by researchers, institutions, funders and journals will require iterative evaluation and improvement. We discuss the goals of these measures, and how they can be implemented, in the hope that this will facilitate action toward improving the transparency, reproducibility and efficiency of scientific research.

Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículo0021
PublicaciónNature human behaviour
Volumen1
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 10 ene 2017
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'A manifesto for reproducible science'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto