TY - JOUR
T1 - 3D printed polymeric stent design
T2 - Mechanical testing and computational modeling
AU - Canalejo-Codina, Francesc
AU - Cano-Morenilla, Mariola
AU - Martorell, Jordi
AU - Balcells, Mercedes
AU - Pegueroles, Marta
AU - García-Granada, Andrés A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Polymer-based bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) aim to reduce the long-term issues associated with metal stents. Yet, first-generation BRS designs experienced a significantly higher rate of clinical failures compared to permanent implants. This prompted the development of alternative scaffolds, such as the poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) solvent-casted stent, whose mechanical performance has yet to be addressed. This study examines the mechanical behavior of this novel scaffold across a wide range of parallel and radial compression diameters. The analysis highlights the scaffold's varying responses under different loading conditions and provides insights into interpreting simulation model parameters to accurately reflect experimental results. Stents demonstrated a parallel crush resistance of 0.11 N/mm at maximum compression, whereas the radial forces were significantly higher, reaching up to 1.80 N/mm. Additionally, the parallel test keeps the stent in the elastic regime, with almost no regions exceeding 50 MPa of stress, while the radial test causes significant structural deformation, with localized plastic strain reaching up to 30 %. Results showed that underestimating yield strain in computational models leads to discrepancies with experimental results, being 5 % the most accurate value for matching computational and experimental results for PLCL solvent-casted stents. This comprehensive approach is vital for optimizing BRS design and predicting clinical performance.
AB - Polymer-based bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) aim to reduce the long-term issues associated with metal stents. Yet, first-generation BRS designs experienced a significantly higher rate of clinical failures compared to permanent implants. This prompted the development of alternative scaffolds, such as the poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) solvent-casted stent, whose mechanical performance has yet to be addressed. This study examines the mechanical behavior of this novel scaffold across a wide range of parallel and radial compression diameters. The analysis highlights the scaffold's varying responses under different loading conditions and provides insights into interpreting simulation model parameters to accurately reflect experimental results. Stents demonstrated a parallel crush resistance of 0.11 N/mm at maximum compression, whereas the radial forces were significantly higher, reaching up to 1.80 N/mm. Additionally, the parallel test keeps the stent in the elastic regime, with almost no regions exceeding 50 MPa of stress, while the radial test causes significant structural deformation, with localized plastic strain reaching up to 30 %. Results showed that underestimating yield strain in computational models leads to discrepancies with experimental results, being 5 % the most accurate value for matching computational and experimental results for PLCL solvent-casted stents. This comprehensive approach is vital for optimizing BRS design and predicting clinical performance.
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Bioresorbable stent
KW - Crush resistance
KW - Finite element analysis
KW - Mechanical performance
KW - Poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207101286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113395
DO - 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113395
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85207101286
SN - 0264-1275
VL - 247
JO - Materials and Design
JF - Materials and Design
M1 - 113395
ER -