Un nuevo orden de prioridad en caso de violación simultánea de la constitución y de la carta de los derechos fundamentales de la unión: La «sugerencia» de la corte costituzionale a los jueces nacionales

Translated title of the contribution: A new priority order in case of simultaneous violation of the constitution and the charter of fundamental rights of the union: The “suggesting” of the corte costituzionale to the national judges

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The direct effects of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union have the consequence that an increasing number of preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union is intended to interpret the fundamental rights protected there. The fact that most of the rights of the Charter are also recog-nized by national constitutions may lead to the same national judge having doubts about the conformity of the relevant norm both with the Constitution of his country and with the Charter. The present work critically reconstructs the phases of Italian constitutional jurisprudence applicable to cases of «double preliminary ruling» as described. In particular, the article focuses on the new doctrine of the Constitutional Court in this matter opened with judgment 269/2017, and its transcendent consequences on the dialogue between courts.

Translated title of the contributionA new priority order in case of simultaneous violation of the constitution and the charter of fundamental rights of the union: The “suggesting” of the corte costituzionale to the national judges
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)299-332
Number of pages34
JournalRevista Espanola de Derecho Constitucional
Volume2020
Issue number119
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A new priority order in case of simultaneous violation of the constitution and the charter of fundamental rights of the union: The “suggesting” of the corte costituzionale to the national judges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this