Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The relationships between foreign competition, absorptive capacity and pioneering innovation: An empirical investigation in Canada

  • Ying Li
  • , Wim Vanhaverbeke

Research output: Not indexed journal article › Article

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between competition and innovation has drawn great attention from economists and strategic management researchers. However, the empirical evidence for this relationship remains inconsistent. On the one hand, the Schumpeterian viewpoint credits that the large firms with substantial monopoly market power have resources and incentives to innovate. On the other hand, it is also possible for a monopolist to have incentives to suppress subsequent innovations. It is suggested by Baldwin and Scott (1987) and Tang (2006) that the relationship between competition and innovation is dependent on the competition context and specific type of innovation activities. In this study, we investigate the relationship between foreign competition and pioneering innovation and consider the moderating role of absorptive capacity for this relationship, using the Canadian Innovation Data. We find a U-shaped relationship between foreign competition and pioneering innovation: when foreign competition increases from a low to a moderate level, the likelihood of pioneering innovation decreases. However, the likelihood of pioneering innovation increases when foreign competition continues to increase from a moderate to a high level. We also found evidence that absorptive capacity may positively moderate the relationship between foreign competition and pioneering innovation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages105-137
Volume13
No.1
Specialist publicationInternational Journal of Innovation Management
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relationships between foreign competition, absorptive capacity and pioneering innovation: An empirical investigation in Canada'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this