Abstract
The article analyses how the Court accepted the legitimacy of national language protection objectives, while subjecting such requirements to a strict proportionality review. It reflects on the judgment’s treatment of educational language rules, the scope of internal market law in the education sector, and the continuing uncertainties surrounding when language requirements are permissible and how much flexibility Member States must allow.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Specialist publication | EU Law Live |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2026 |
Keywords
- EU law
- linguistic rights
- internal market
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Compatibility of Language Proficiency Requirements with the Internal Market: Another “Yes, but” in Vilinus International School'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver