Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Shelf space schemas: Myth or reality?

Research output: Indexed journal article › Article › peer-review

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A series of studies identifies that consumers hold beliefs about how retailers organize product displays in stores. These beliefs do not reflect reality, but consumers pervasively use them even when discredited. Study 1 finds that consumers believe popular products are placed on middle shelves, expensive products on top shelves and promoted products on the extremes of a display. However, a field study encompassing two different geographical areas, eight stores and four product categories shows that retailer layouts contradict consumers' beliefs about middle and horizontal positions, but they follow consumers' intuitions about verticality, albeit, inconsistently. Based on these findings about the mismatch between consumers' beliefs and retailers' actual assortments, a laboratory experiment examines whether position effects are robust. The study finds that position effects are only partially attenuated when consumers are explicitly informed that store layouts are not informative. A discussion of implications for retailers and product managers follows.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)881-888
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume66
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognitive schemas
  • Congruency theory
  • Retail strategy
  • Shelf placement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shelf space schemas: Myth or reality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this