Santander acquires abbey: The jack project

Research output: Book chapterConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The case 'Santander Acquires Abbey: The Jack Project' examines the managerial decisionmaking process in 2004 prior to the acquisition of Abbey. The primary argument highlights how the strategic management of information systems is a 'core competence' within the Santander's growth strategy based on mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Students are asked to put themselves in the position of José María Fuster (CIO Grupo Santander). Their first task is to assess the information technology (IT) strategies of Santander and Abbey, and understand their value and roles. The second task is to explore the differences between 'customer-centric' and 'product centric' IT platforms and their alignment with business and growth strategies. As a final task, students are asked to assess how this merger could be performed by leveraging the IT capacity that Grupo Santander had developed for the acquisition - despite the doubts expressed about its feasibility by financial analysts. The case was written for general management programs, as well as MBA and executive MBA degree courses in information systems strategy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICIS 2010 Proceedings - Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes
Event31st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2010 - Saint Louis, MO, United States
Duration: 12 Dec 201015 Dec 2010

Publication series

NameICIS 2010 Proceedings - Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems

Conference

Conference31st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2010
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySaint Louis, MO
Period12/12/1015/12/10

Keywords

  • IT platforms
  • Mergers & Acquisition
  • Strategy on information systems
  • Teaching cases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Santander acquires abbey: The jack project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this