Reliability and validity of the footprint assessment method using photoshop CS5 software

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Several sophisticated methods of footprint analysis currently exist. However, it is sometimes useful to apply standard measurement methods of recognized evidence with an easy and quick application. We sought to assess the reliability and validity of a new method of footprint assessment in a healthy population using Photoshop CS5 software (Adobe Systems Inc, San Jose, California). Methods: Forty-two footprints, corresponding to 21 healthy individuals (11 men with a mean ± SD age of 20.45 ± 2.16 years and 10 women with a mean ± SD age of 20.00 ± 1.70 years) were analyzed. Footprints were recorded in static bipedal standing position using optical podography and digital photography. Three trials for each participant were performed. The Hernández-Corvo, Chippaux-Smirak, and Staheli indices and the Clarke angle were calculated by manual method and by computerized method using Photoshop CS5 software. Test-retest was used to determine reliability. Validity was obtained by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The reliability test for all of the indices showed high values (ICC, 0.98-0.99). Moreover, the validity test clearly showed no difference between techniques (ICC, 0.99-1). Conclusions: The reliability and validity of a method to measure, assess, and record the podometric indices using Photoshop CS5 software has been demonstrated. This provides a quick and accurate tool useful for the digital recording of morphostatic foot study parameters and their control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-232
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume105
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of the footprint assessment method using photoshop CS5 software'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this