Quality of reporting acupuncture interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Review of adherence to the STRICTA statement

Carles Fernández-Jané, Mireia Solà-Madurell, Mingkun Yu, Changhao Liang, Yutong Fei, Mercè Sitjà-Rabert, Gerard Úrrutia

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The quality of reporting of acupuncture interventions is critical to ensure the applicability and reproducibility of acupuncture clinical trials. In the past, different publications have evaluated the quality of reporting of acupuncture interventions for different clinical situations, such as knee osteoarthritis, neurological diseases or cancer. However, this has not been done for acupuncture trials for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective: To assess the quality of reporting of acupuncture interventions in trials for COPD. Methods: A total of 11 English and Chinese databases were screened up until May 2019 for randomised or quasi-randomised control trials of acupuncture for COPD. The STRICTA checklist was used to determine the quality of the reporting of acupuncture interventions. Results: A total of 28 trials were included in our review. Out of the 16 STRICTA checklist subitems analysed, only 3 were considered appropriately reported in more than 70% of the trials, while 7 were correctly reported in less than 40%. Conclusion: The adherence to STRICTA guidelines of acupuncture trials for COPD is suboptimal, and future efforts need to be addressed to improve the quality of reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226
Number of pages1
JournalF1000Research
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Acupuncture
  • COPD
  • Quality of Reporting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of reporting acupuncture interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Review of adherence to the STRICTA statement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this