Abstract
This article describes the different traditions within the psychotherapy integration movement. It begins by providing a constructivist view of the factors that influenced the movement's development. It distinguishes among pragmatic, theoretically guided, and systematic technical eclecticisms. Also, it differentiates between hybrid and extended models of theoretical integration. Finally, the article covers the common factors perspective. For each of these types of psychotherapy integration, a series of constructivist contributions is presented. Further, constructivism has generated a new modality of psychotherapy integration known as theoretically progressive integration, based on the combination of approaches that are epistemologically compatible.
| Translated title of the contribution | Psychotherapy integration: Reflexions and contributions from a constructivist epistemology |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 192-222 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Journal of Psychotherapy Integration |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Psychotherapy integration: Reflexions and contributions from a constructivist epistemology: Reflections and contributions from a constructivist epistemology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver