Abstract
Pseudo-set framing-arbitrarily grouping items or tasks together as part of an apparent "set"-motivates people to reach perceived completion points. Pseudo-set framing changes gambling choices (Study 1), effort (Studies 2 and 3), giving behavior (Field Data and Study 4), and purchase decisions (Study 5). These effects persist in the absence of any reward, when a cost must be incurred, and after participants are explicitly informed of the arbitrariness of the set. Drawing on Gestalt psychology, we develop a conceptual account that predicts what will-and will not-act as a pseudo-set, and defines the psychological process through which these pseudo-sets affect behavior: over and above typical reference points, pseudo-set framing alters perceptions of (in)completeness, making intermediate progress seem less complete. In turn, these feelings of incompleteness motivate people to persist until the pseudo-set has been fulfilled.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1460-1477 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |
| Volume | 146 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Decision making
- Framing effects
- Gestalt psychology
- Judgment
- Perception
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pseudo-set framing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver