Abstract
Pseudo-set framing-arbitrarily grouping items or tasks together as part of an apparent "set"-motivates people to reach perceived completion points. Pseudo-set framing changes gambling choices (Study 1), effort (Studies 2 and 3), giving behavior (Field Data and Study 4), and purchase decisions (Study 5). These effects persist in the absence of any reward, when a cost must be incurred, and after participants are explicitly informed of the arbitrariness of the set. Drawing on Gestalt psychology, we develop a conceptual account that predicts what will-and will not-act as a pseudo-set, and defines the psychological process through which these pseudo-sets affect behavior: over and above typical reference points, pseudo-set framing alters perceptions of (in)completeness, making intermediate progress seem less complete. In turn, these feelings of incompleteness motivate people to persist until the pseudo-set has been fulfilled.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1460-1477 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |
Volume | 146 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Decision making
- Framing effects
- Gestalt psychology
- Judgment
- Perception