Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predictors of efficacy in depression prevention programmes: Meta-analysis

  • Eva Jané-Llopis*
  • , Clemens Hosman
  • , Rachel Jenkins
  • , Peter Anderson
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Indexed journal article Reviewpeer-review

170 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, 340 million people are affected by depression, with high comorbid, social and economic costs. Aims: To identify potential predictors of effect in prevention programmes. Method: A meta-analysis was made of 69 programmes to reduce depression or depressive symptoms. Results: The weighted mean effect size of 0.22 was effective for different age groups and different levels of risk, and in reducing risk factors and depressive or psychiatric symptoms. Programmes with larger effect sizes were multi-component, included competence techniques, had more than eight sessions, had sessions 60-90 min long, had a high quality of research design and were delivered by a health care provider in targeted programmes. Older people benefited from social support, whereas behavioural methods were detrimental. Conclusions: An 11% improvement in depressive symptoms can be achieved through prevention programmes. Single trial evaluations should ensure high quality ofthe research design and detailed reporting of results and potential predictors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-397
Number of pages14
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume183
Issue numberNOV.
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of efficacy in depression prevention programmes: Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this