Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Nitrosamines and heme iron and risk of prostate cancer in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition

  • Paula G. Jakszyn*
  • , Naomi E. Allen
  • , Leila Lujan-Barroso
  • , Carlos A. Gonzalez
  • , Timothy J. Key
  • , Ana Fonseca-Nunes
  • , Anne Tjnøneland
  • , Nina Fnøs-Johnsen
  • , Kim Overvad
  • , Birgit Teucher
  • , Kuanrong Li
  • , Heiner Boeing
  • , Antonia Trichopoulou
  • , Eleni Oikonomou
  • , Maria Sarantopoulou
  • , Calogero Saieva
  • , Vittorio Krogh
  • , Rosario Tumino
  • , Fulvio Ricceri
  • , H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
  • JoséM Huerta, Eva Ardanaz, Marcial V. Arguelles, Esther Molina-Montes, Nerea Larranãga, Elisabet Wirfal̈, Peter Wallstrom̈, Mattias Johansson, Par̈ Stattin, Kay Tee Khaw, Mazda Jenab, Veronika Fedirko, Elio Riboli
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The evidence about nitrosamines and heme iron intake and cancer risk is limited, despite the biologic plausibility of the hypothesis that these factors might increase cancer risk. We investigated the association between dietary nitrosamines and heme iron and the risk of prostate cancer among participants of European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Methods: Data on food consumption and complete follow-up for cancer occurrence was available for 139,005 men, recruited in 8 European countries. Estimates of HRs were obtained by proportional hazard models, stratified by age at recruitment, and study center, and adjusted for total energy intake, smoking status, marital status, dairy products, educational level, and body mass index. Results: After a mean follow-up of 10 years, 4,606 participants were diagnosed with first incident prostate cancer.Therewas no overall association between prostate cancer risk and nitrosamines exposure (preformed and endogenous) or heme iron intake (HR for a doubling of intake: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98-1.03 for N-Nitrosodimethlyamine, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88-1.03 for endogenous Nitrosocompounds, and 1.00; 95 CI: 0.97-1.03 for heme iron). Conclusions and Impact: Our findings do not support an effect of nitrosamines (endogenous and exogenous) and heme iron intake on prostate cancer risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-551
Number of pages5
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nitrosamines and heme iron and risk of prostate cancer in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this