Abstract
This paper compares two multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches based on linguis-tic label assessment. The first approach consists of a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology in-troduced by Kaya and Kahraman in 2011. The second approach, introduced by Agell et al. in 2012, is based on qualitative reasoning techniques for ranking multi-attribute alternatives in group decision-making with linguistic labels. Both approaches are applied to a case of assess-ment and selection of the most suitable types of energy in a geographical area.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 5 Feb 2014 |
| Event | XVII Congreso Español sobre Tecnologías y Lógica Fuzzy (ESTYLF 2014) - Duration: 5 Feb 2014 → 7 Feb 2014 |
Conference
| Conference | XVII Congreso Español sobre Tecnologías y Lógica Fuzzy (ESTYLF 2014) |
|---|---|
| Period | 5/02/14 → 7/02/14 |