Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

It’s not Just Business: Frequency and Intensity of Basic Emotions at Work and Triggered Events

  • José Navarro*
  • , Rita Rueff-Lopes
  • , Malena Otero
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Drawing on Affective Events Theory, Event System Theory, and Appraisal Theory, we examine how six discrete emotions arise in daily work. A total of 102 employees provided 1,499 diary entries describing salient events and rating their valence, strength, and emotional impact. Happiness emerged as the most frequent and intense emotion, whereas fear and disgust appeared less often yet could still be powerful. The interaction event valence-event strength predicted every emotion except fear, for which only strength mattered. Gender had minimal effects on intensity but did shape reporting frequency. The analysis also clarifies which event categories typically trigger each emotion—for example, goal attainment for happiness, injustice perceptions for anger, or safety concerns for fear—providing a fine-grained map of affective antecedents. Overall, the findings refine theory by showing that workplace affect extends beyond a simple positive-negative divide. Organizations may shape emotional climates by fostering positive, strong events and mitigating negative, high-impact ones.

Translated title of the contributionMás allá del negocio: la frecuencia, la intensidad y los eventos detonantes de las emociones básicas en el trabajo
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere260769
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalRevista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

Keywords

  • Workplace emotions Affective events theory Event strength Event triggers Intensive longitudinal methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'It’s not Just Business: Frequency and Intensity of Basic Emotions at Work and Triggered Events'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this