Intentionally "biased": People purposely use to-be-ignored information, but can be persuaded not to

Berkeley J. Dietvorst*, U. Simonsohn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abundant research has shown that people fail to disregard to-be-ignored information (e.g., hindsight bias, curse of knowledge), which has contributed to the popular notion that people are unwillingly and unconsciously affected by information. Here we provide evidence that, instead, people simply do not want to ignore such information. The findings: In Studies 1 and 2, the majority of participants explicitly indicated a desire to use to-be-ignored information in classic paradigms. In Study 3, the effect of receiving to-be-ignored information was driven entirely by the subset of people who wanted to use it. In Study 4, persuading participants to ignore inadmissible evidence in a mock jury trial reduced the impact of such evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1228-1238
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume148
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Curse of knowledge
  • Decision making
  • Hindsight bias
  • Judgment
  • Jurors

Cite this