Impacto de los efluentes de granjas camaroneras con baja densidad de siembra en la calidad del agua de un humedal costero tropical

Translated title of the contribution: Impact of low stocking densities shrimp farm effluents in water quality of a tropical coastal wetland

M. D. Rovira, N. A. de López, J. Sempere, R. Nomen

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

Abstract

The effects of shrimp aquaculture on the water quality of the Jiquilisco Bay (El Salvador) was evaluated for small-scale shrimp farming with low stocking densities (≤ 12 shrimps/m2). Two sites were selected for study: one in a concentrated shrimp farming area and the other few kilometers away without shrimp farms influence. Water samples were collected at nine different locations for spatial assessment and were taken on three occasions for temporal assessment. Parameters related to nutrient waste from shrimp farms included: biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids, nitrate, nitrite, dissolved phosphorus and ammonia, temperature, salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen. Effluents from shrimp farms did not exceed the limits established by regulatory norms for nitrite, nitrate, ammonia, BOD, pH and phosphorus. Significant differences for the concentrations of total suspended solids (TSS) and BOD were observed. They were higher in the channel with shrimp farms influence and always in the raining season, probably due to the drag of the rivers more than the shrimp production. It seems that at these stocking densities the carrying capacity of Jiquilisco bay was not exceeded.

Translated title of the contributionImpact of low stocking densities shrimp farm effluents in water quality of a tropical coastal wetland
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)53-62
Number of pages10
JournalAfinidad
Volume77
Issue number789
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of low stocking densities shrimp farm effluents in water quality of a tropical coastal wetland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this