Abstract
We examine team diversity and performance in the asset management industry through the lens of identity. Focusing on political ideology as the relevant dimension of identity, we find that diverse teams outperform homogeneous teams. The mechanism involves both improved decision making due to more diverse perspectives and increased monitoring by heterogeneous team members. The benefits of ideological diversity are undone when political polarization is higher, consistent with increased intrateam conflict. In examining why less diverse teams are prevalent in asset management, we find entrenched managers prefer homogeneous teams, and the local labor market supply of ideologically diverse managers is constrained.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3026-3051 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Management Science |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- campaign contributions
- dispersion in beliefs
- diversity
- identity
- labor incentives
- mutual fund
- PACs
- polarization
- political ideology
- teams
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Identity, Diversity, and Team Performance: Evidence from U.S. Mutual Funds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver