Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Framing the conundrum of total cost of ownership of open source software

Research output: Book chapterConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This paper reflects the results of phase I of our study on the total cost of ownership (TCO) of open source software adoption. Not only have we found TCO to be an intriguing issue but it is contentious, baffling and each company approaches it in a distinctive manner (and sometimes not at all). In effect it is a conundrum that needs unpacking before it can be explained and understood. Our paper discusses the components of TCO as total cost of ownership and total cost of acquisition (and besides). Using this broad dichotomy and its various components we then analyze our data to make sense of procurement decisions in relation to open source software in the public sector and private companies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOpen Source Systems
Subtitle of host publicationGrounding Research - 7th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2011, Proceedings
EditorsScott A. Hissam, Barbara Russo, Manoel G. de Mendonça Neto, Fabio Kon
PublisherSpringer New York LLC
Pages208-219
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9783642244179
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event7th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference on Open Source Systems: Grounding Research, OSS 2011 - Salvador, Brazil
Duration: 6 Oct 20117 Oct 2011

Publication series

NameIFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
Volume365
ISSN (Print)1868-4238
ISSN (Electronic)1868-422X

Conference

Conference7th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference on Open Source Systems: Grounding Research, OSS 2011
Country/TerritoryBrazil
CitySalvador
Period6/10/117/10/11

Keywords

  • Benefits
  • Exit costs
  • Open source software
  • Software adoption
  • Total cost of ownership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Framing the conundrum of total cost of ownership of open source software'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this