Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke secondary to infective endocarditis

  • the Mechanical Thrombectomy in IE Investigators
  • , Cat-SCR Consortium

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Acute ischaemic strokes (stroke) are frequent and severe extracardiac complications in infective endocarditis (IE). Because intravenous thrombolysis (i.v.-thrombolysis) is contraindicated, mechanical thrombectomy (thrombectomy) offers potential benefits. We aimed to compare thrombectomy efficacy and safety between IE-related and general stroke cases. Methods: Multicentre study of consecutive IE cases treated with thrombectomy at nine stroke centres in Spain from 2011 to 2022. Using propensity score matching, 50 IE cases were 1:4 matched with patients without IE stroke (n = 200). Efficacy was defined by successful recanalization rates (modified treatment in cerebral ischaemia scale ≥2 b), neurological improvement at 24 hours (decrease of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale compared with baseline), and good neurological outcome rates at 3 months (modified Rankin scale ≤2). Safety was assessed by intracranial haemorrhage (IC-haemorrhage), symptomatic IC-haemorrhage, crude mortality, and stroke-related mortality. Results: Among 54 IE cases, 50 were matched with 200 controls. Successful recanalization was similarly achieved in both groups (76% vs. 83%). Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours was comparable, with analogous rates of neurological improvement (78% vs. 78%), and early dramatic response (48% vs. 46.5%). No differences were seen regarding IC-haemorrhage rates, except for when prior i.v.-thrombolysis was given. Although crude mortality was higher in the IE cohort, no differences were seen in stroke-related mortality (12% vs. 15%). At 3 months, modified Rankin scale scores of the two groups were superimposable. Discussion: Thrombectomy in IE is as effective and safe as in patients without IE, and prior i.v.-thrombolysis could decrease the procedural safety. Clinical practice guidelines may consider including the recommendation to perform thrombectomy alone in IE-related stroke.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1321-1329
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Acute ischaemic stroke
  • Cerebral embolism
  • Endovascular therapy
  • Infective endocarditis
  • Mechanical thrombectomy
  • Thrombolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke secondary to infective endocarditis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this