EEG feature selection using mutual information and support vector machine: A comparative analysis

Carlos Guerrero-Mosquera, Michel Verleysen, Angel Navia Vazquez

Research output: Book chapterConference contributionpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The large number of methods for EEG feature extraction demands a good choice for EEG features for every task. This paper compares three subsets of features obtained by tracks extraction method, wavelet transform and fractional Fourier transform. Particularly, we compare the performance of each subset in classification tasks using support vector machines and then we select possible combination of features b y feature selection methods based on forward-backward procedure and mutual information as relevance criteria. Results confirm that fractional Fourier transform coefficients present very good performance and also the possibility of using some combination of this features to improve the performance of the classifier. To reinforce the relevance of the study, we carry out 1000 independent runs using a bootstrap approach, and evaluate the statistical significance of the Fscore results using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10
Pages4946-4949
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes
Event2010 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10 - Buenos Aires, Argentina
Duration: 31 Aug 20104 Sept 2010

Publication series

Name2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10

Conference

Conference2010 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10
Country/TerritoryArgentina
CityBuenos Aires
Period31/08/104/09/10

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EEG feature selection using mutual information and support vector machine: A comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this