TY - JOUR
T1 - Direct transfer to angiosuite to reduce door-to-puncture time in thrombectomy for acute stroke
AU - Ribo, Marc
AU - Boned, Sandra
AU - Rubiera, Marta
AU - Tomasello, Alejandro
AU - Coscojuela, Pilar
AU - Hernández, David
AU - Pagola, Jorge
AU - Juega, Jesús
AU - Rodriguez, Noelia
AU - Muchada, Marian
AU - Rodriguez-Luna, David
AU - Molina, Carlos A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding The study was funded by Stryker Neurovascular. The funding source was not involved in study design, monitoring, data collection, statistical analyses, interpretation of results, or manuscript writing.
Publisher Copyright:
© Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Objective To evaluate direct transfer to the angiosuite protocol of patients with acute stroke, candidates for endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods We studied workflow metrics of all patients with stroke who had undergone EVT in the past 12 months. Patients followed three protocols: direct transfer to emergency room (DTER), CT room (DTCT) or angiosuite (DTAS, only last 6 months if admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >9 and time from onset <4.5 hours) according to staff/ suite availability. DTAS patients underwent cone-beam CT before femoral puncture. Dramatic clinical improvement was defined as 10 NIHSS points drop at 24 hours. Results 201 patients were included: 87 DTER (43.3%), 74 DTCT (36.8%), 40 DTAS (19.9%). Ten DTAS patients (25%) did not receive EVT: 3 (7.5%) showed intracranial hemorrhage on cone-beam CT and 7 (17.5%) did not show an occlusion on angiography. Mean door-to-puncture (D2P) time was shorter in DTAS (17+8 min) than DTCT (60+29 min; p<0.01). D2P was longer in DTER (90+53 min) than in the other protocols ( p<0.01). For outcome analyses only patients who received EVT were compared; no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including time from symptom-onset to admission, puncture-torecanalization, or recanalization rate, were seen. However, time from symptom-to-puncture (DTAS: 197 +72 min, DTER: 279+156, DTCT: 224+142 min; p=0.01) and symptom-to-recanalization (DTAS: 257+74, DTER: 355+158, DTCT: 279+146 min; p<0.01) were longer in the DTER group. At 24 hours, there were no differences in NIHSS score ( p=0.81); however, the rate of dramatic clinical improvement was significantly higher in DTAS: 48.6% (DTER 24.1%, DTCT 27.4%); p=0.01). An adjusted model pointed to shorter onset-to-puncture time as an independent predictor of dramatic improvement (OR=1.23, 95% CI 1.13 to 133; p<0.01) Conclusion In a subgroup of patients direct transfer and triage in the angiosuite seems feasible, safe, and achieves significant reduction in hospital workflow times.
AB - Objective To evaluate direct transfer to the angiosuite protocol of patients with acute stroke, candidates for endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods We studied workflow metrics of all patients with stroke who had undergone EVT in the past 12 months. Patients followed three protocols: direct transfer to emergency room (DTER), CT room (DTCT) or angiosuite (DTAS, only last 6 months if admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >9 and time from onset <4.5 hours) according to staff/ suite availability. DTAS patients underwent cone-beam CT before femoral puncture. Dramatic clinical improvement was defined as 10 NIHSS points drop at 24 hours. Results 201 patients were included: 87 DTER (43.3%), 74 DTCT (36.8%), 40 DTAS (19.9%). Ten DTAS patients (25%) did not receive EVT: 3 (7.5%) showed intracranial hemorrhage on cone-beam CT and 7 (17.5%) did not show an occlusion on angiography. Mean door-to-puncture (D2P) time was shorter in DTAS (17+8 min) than DTCT (60+29 min; p<0.01). D2P was longer in DTER (90+53 min) than in the other protocols ( p<0.01). For outcome analyses only patients who received EVT were compared; no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including time from symptom-onset to admission, puncture-torecanalization, or recanalization rate, were seen. However, time from symptom-to-puncture (DTAS: 197 +72 min, DTER: 279+156, DTCT: 224+142 min; p=0.01) and symptom-to-recanalization (DTAS: 257+74, DTER: 355+158, DTCT: 279+146 min; p<0.01) were longer in the DTER group. At 24 hours, there were no differences in NIHSS score ( p=0.81); however, the rate of dramatic clinical improvement was significantly higher in DTAS: 48.6% (DTER 24.1%, DTCT 27.4%); p=0.01). An adjusted model pointed to shorter onset-to-puncture time as an independent predictor of dramatic improvement (OR=1.23, 95% CI 1.13 to 133; p<0.01) Conclusion In a subgroup of patients direct transfer and triage in the angiosuite seems feasible, safe, and achieves significant reduction in hospital workflow times.
KW - Intervention
KW - Stroke
KW - Thrombectomy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85040711721
U2 - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013038
DO - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013038
M3 - Article
C2 - 28446535
AN - SCOPUS:85040711721
SN - 1759-8478
VL - 10
SP - 221
EP - 224
JO - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
IS - 3
ER -