Abstract
There is considerable debate in the literature as to the precise definition of 'left-behind' places, and the appropriate metrics for identifying them, and for successfully targeting regional policy interventions. We propose an evaluation structure for 'left-behindness' based on Amartya Sen's capability approach, and argue that the diversity of criteria should not be seen as a shortcoming, but rather as a richness to be explored. We show, through the use of 'posets' and Hasse diagrams, that there are several distinct 'structures of left-behindness' across European NUTS 2 regions, revealing spatial imbalances that do not conform to a 'one size fits all' narrative.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 163-180 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Keywords
- capability approach
- Hasse diagrams
- left-behind places
- LNOB
- posets
- regional inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Defining left behind places: an internationally comparative poset analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver