TY - JOUR
T1 - Community Influence Capacity on Firms
T2 - Lessons from the Peruvian Highlands
AU - Arenas, D.
AU - Murphy, Matthew
AU - Jáuregui, Kety
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful for the feedback received from the three anonymous reviewers and the senior editor. We also benefited from comments offered by participants in various conferences and seminars where previous versions of this work were presented: Cross Sector Social Interactions Symposium 2014, Academy of Management Meeting 2015, Gronen Reading Group 2017, Latin American Studies Association Conference 2018, Audencia Business School, and the Institute for Social Innovation of ESADE. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - While much research has studied corporate management of stakeholders, this research focuses on the capacity of stakeholders to influence firms. Using a grounded theory research design, we draw on a comparative analysis of the relations between two neighbouring communities in the Peruvian highlands and the mining project that affects them. Our analysis suggests that control of resources and structural configurations are insufficient for explaining divergent actions and influence capacity, and highlights the role played by factors that we refer to as community vigour and the community’s pool of knowledge. We argue that these factors explain a community’s ability to develop an informed and shared interpretation of the situation in relation to firms and, therefore, to identify and carry out actions that will be more likely to influence firms to the community’s satisfaction. Thus, community vigour and pool of knowledge are additional sources of influence capacity. These findings contribute to the literature on stakeholder influence by providing a conceptual model that explains variance in stakeholder influence capacity that theories of resource dependence, structural position or network centrality do not fully explain.
AB - While much research has studied corporate management of stakeholders, this research focuses on the capacity of stakeholders to influence firms. Using a grounded theory research design, we draw on a comparative analysis of the relations between two neighbouring communities in the Peruvian highlands and the mining project that affects them. Our analysis suggests that control of resources and structural configurations are insufficient for explaining divergent actions and influence capacity, and highlights the role played by factors that we refer to as community vigour and the community’s pool of knowledge. We argue that these factors explain a community’s ability to develop an informed and shared interpretation of the situation in relation to firms and, therefore, to identify and carry out actions that will be more likely to influence firms to the community’s satisfaction. Thus, community vigour and pool of knowledge are additional sources of influence capacity. These findings contribute to the literature on stakeholder influence by providing a conceptual model that explains variance in stakeholder influence capacity that theories of resource dependence, structural position or network centrality do not fully explain.
KW - community
KW - mining
KW - negotiation
KW - resistance
KW - stakeholder influence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060160598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0170840618814567
DO - 10.1177/0170840618814567
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060160598
SN - 0170-8406
VL - 41
SP - 737
EP - 765
JO - Organization Studies
JF - Organization Studies
IS - 6
ER -