Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bang for the buck: Gain-loss ratio as a driver of judgment and choice

  • Bart De Langhe
  • , Stefano Puntoni

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prominent decision-making theories propose that individuals (should) evaluate alternatives by combining gains and losses in an additive way. Instead, we suggest that individuals seek to maximize the rate of exchange between positive and negative outcomes and thus combine gains and losses in a multiplicative way. Sensitivity to gain-loss ratio provides an alternative account for several existing findings and implies a number of novel predictions. It implies greater sensitivity to losses and risk aversion when expected value is positive, but greater sensitivity to gains and risk seeking when expected value is negative. It also implies more extreme preferences when expected value is positive than when expected value is negative. These predictions are independent of decreasing marginal sensitivity, loss aversion, and probability weighting-three key properties of prospect theory. Five new experiments and reanalyses of two recently published studies support these predictions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2045
Pages (from-to)1137-1163
Number of pages27
JournalManagement Science
Volume61
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Decreasing marginal sensitivity
  • Efficiency
  • Gain-loss ratio
  • Loss aversion
  • Mixed gambles
  • Probability weighting
  • Prospect theory
  • Risk preference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bang for the buck: Gain-loss ratio as a driver of judgment and choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this