Abstract
This paper examines the concept of allegiance effects in psychotherapy research from a constructivist approach. After considering their role in outcome and process research, a constructivist explanation of them is proposed. It is also suggested that traditional ways to control them, while necessary and sound, may not be enough. Alternatively, a call for methodological pluralism in psychotherapy research is made, especially regarding the inclusion of qualitative, hermeneutic, phenomenological and discovery oriented case studies that privilege the voice of clients and not only the researchers favoured constructs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 55-64 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Alliance effects
- Constructivism
- Psychotherapy research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Allegiance effects in psychotherapy research: A constructivist approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver